This assignment biased on human right. The human rights assure few laws and regulation called Human Right law. There are various national and international organizations who are working for human right. International human rights law designs the body of law to protect human rights at the international, national, and domestic levels. It is based upon the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Charter of the United Nations.

Among of the organization, Amnesty International is non-governmental organization (NGO) founded in London on May 28, 1961. They formed for protecting human right and also fight for human right. For their activities, got Nobel Prize in 1977 for Peace. In this whole assignment, try to discuss about International Human Right Law in the light of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).

Task 1

a. Assess the rationale and motivations that lay behind the development of international human rights principles and law.

The concept of international human right law has growth after founding United Nation. The international human rights programme was powerful when the United Nations General Assembly adopted of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on 10 December 1948. That was the result of the experience of the Second World War. It develops for assuring basic rights and fundamental freedoms to all human beings and equal consideration to everyone. The human rights principal protects social, cultural, economic, civil and political rights. Without thinking what kind of right issued, there are few basic principles that are part of human rights. The basic principles of UDHR are Universality, Indivisibility, Participation, Accountability, Transparency and Non-Discrimination. The rationale and motivations that lay behind the development of international human rights principles and law are noted below.

· People are entitled to rights simply by virtue of being human.

· Government disrupts rights such as health, it necessarily affects people’s ability to exercise other rights like as life.

· To ensure human rights, governments must support the participation of civil society.

· To ensure mechanisms of accountability for the enforcement of rights.

· To assure to know the right of major decisions affecting rights made and how public institutions going on.

· To remove all kinds of discrimination like as policies and practices (NESRI, 2013).

b. Evaluate the extent to which the human rights principles you have assessed above are valid. Answer you should explore the strengths and weakness of the human rights principles.

There are few strengths of the principles. Basically Human right principal forms for justice. Before of forming that there is no restriction rules and regulation for human right. There is no slandered by which we can say that the man is alienated. The principles are the measurement of Human right. Over the last six decades since the adoption of the UDHR, human rights have progressively developed into a universal value system, and it is now generally accepted that ‘the promotion and protection of all human rights is a legitimate concern of the international community, and it is against this that states are assessed today. Clearly, the scope and bounds of human rights have enormously transcended the initial rights guaranteed under the UDHR in 1948. While it is certainly impossible to attempt to address all the related issues, progresses and failures in that concern in a single volume of this nature, this book has been carefully organised and issues carefully certain to cover the principal and most relevant aspects of the developments (Mashood, et al., 2013).

Recent research (Mashood, et al., 2013) has found that in Arjun Sengupta examines the concept of the right to development in international human rights law. The argument on the right to development has been a very topical one, principally between developed and developing countries, since the 1980s. The UDHR did not provide specifically for the right to development, and that a specific concept of the right to development under international human rights law postdates the UDHR. The right to development was first recognized in 1986, in the UN Declaration on the right to Development, it appeared to be a utopian right, but was later appreciated and adopted by academics, civil society leaders and policymakers from both the developed and developing countries. The obligations for realizing the right to development would essentially derive from the obligations of realizing all those recognized rights under international human rights law.

c. Outline and explain in detail the differences between the UK Human Rights Act 1998 and any international human rights law.

The Human Rights Act 1998 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which actually came into conclusion in the year 2000 on October. Basically it means that all laws of the UK, before and after the passage of the act, must be construed in the light of it. It has artificial how almost every public body in the country is continued, and is extensively evaluated from the political right and narrowly evaluated from the political absent. It is also one of the vanishingly few things that Tony Blair got right. The Human Rights Act is applicable to all public bodies within the UK like as central government, local authorities, and bodies exercising public functions (Legislation, 1998).

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union protects certain social, economic and political rights for EU citizens and inhabitants into EU law. It was enrolled by the European Convention and solemnly announced on 7 December 2000 by the European Commission, the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. According to this Charter, the European Union must act and legislate reliably with the Charter and the EU's benches will strike down legislation approved by the EU's institutions that contravenes it and applies to the Institutions of the European Union and its member (JUSTICE, 2013).

Both of the laws formed for promoting human rights differently. Human right act said any person can takes an action against a public authority which has proposes to act in such a human rights charter. The conference’s leading up to the signing to the Lisbon Treaty, Poland and UK tenable a protocol to the application of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights. The first title of EU human rights charter are dignity, guarantees the right to life and prohibits torture, slavery, the death penalty, eugenic practices and human cloning which are assure human right. It has also seven titles that is made for human right. It actively promotes and defends them both within its borders and when engaging in relations with non-EU countries. Every year it adopts its Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy. The EU’s human rights policy involves civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights (EEAS, 2014).

Task 2

a. Along with Prohibition against Torture, identify and explain at least TWO other international human rights provisions/laws in society and then discuss their purpose/role.

The above scenario on south-east Zeppelinia or new state Joplin, the police sector of the province work and control under the local province authority. They are not working with state government instruction. In spite of having credible reporters, they can’t express original report due to torture by authority. Torture violates right of human law. There is International law against torture. Torture cannot be acceptable under any conditions. The UN has predestined torture as a rejection of the resolutions of its Charter and as a violation of the human rights and fundamental freedoms declared in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Torture is also prohibited by most domestic legal systems in the world and no specific crime of torture.

The prohibition of torture in international law is distinguished in that it is absolute, using at all times and in all conditions. Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states 1948 (UDHR): ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’ The right to be allowed to torture and other abuse is taken up in major international and provincial human rights agreements as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), the European Convention on Human Rights (1950), the American Convention on Human Rights (1978) and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (1981). In 1984 the UN implicit the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, focusing the particular consideration given to this complete prohibition, and providing extra rules to assist in prevention and investigation (PHR, 2006).

The prohibition of torture also is contained in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), approved by 153 countries, together with the United States in 1992, and in the Convention against Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the Convention against Torture), approved by 136 countries, including the United States in 1994. It is also codified in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Human Right Watch, 2003).

After that we can say that those articles directly oppose the torture that is existing south-east Zeppelinia or Joplin. If they are democratic or obey those law only then possible to get fair report.

b. Evaluate how effective the international human rights provisions/laws (identiﬁed in Task 2a above) are on a NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL level.

The torture is against human right. There is International law against torture. Torture cannot be acceptable under any conditions. The Convention against Torture defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession…." (Article 1 of UDHR). It may be "imposed by or at the instigation of or agreement of a public official or other person acting in an official capability." For example of statement is beating on the soles of the feet; rape; near drowning through submersion in water; burning; whipping; needles inserted under fingernails; mutilation etc.

Those statement approved by nationally and internationally. The right to be allowed to torture and other abuse is taken up in major international and provincial human rights agreements as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), the European Convention on Human Rights (1950), the American Convention on Human Rights (1978) and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (1981). In 1984 the UN assumed the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, focusing the particular consideration given to this complete prohibition, and providing extra rules to assist in prevention and investigation (PHR, 2006).

International humanitarian law, of which the Geneva Conventions form a part, comprises laws protective people in times of armed conflict. The prevention against torture in benevolent law is specifically found in a number of requirements of the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols of 1977. An act of torture dedicated in the condition of an armed battle is a war crime (PHR, 2006). Under international law, the use of torture can be gaped as both the responsibility of the state itself and the separate criminal responsibility of persons involved. Those who carry out the act of torture can be tried in domestic and international courts.

c. Assess the problems in upholding human rights provisions such as those provisions identiﬁed in Task 2a above, including the limitations to the protection against refoulement under international refugee law? Refer to case law on the “right to a fair trial”.

Under international refugee law, a refugee is sternly defined as a person who “owing to well-founded fear of being wronged for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. The declaration of refugee law is closely related with the people of south-east Zeppelinia/Joplin mentioned in scenario. The reporter can’t say anything due to provisional torture. Persons recognised as refugees under Article 1A(2) of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention) have no reason to seek protection under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR); they are protected against refoulement and they are granted refugee status in domestic law. In specific, the Refugee Convention provides that refugees should be treated equally “as far as possible” to nationals (Lambert, 2005).

The ECHR was planned to safeguard the action of everyone within the region of the Contracting States. Up until now, its influence on refugees has been limited to the respect by the Court of an implicit duty of States to defend refugees against exclusion based on the significances of such actions in the country of return. The Court has recognised the theoretical basis of Articles 3, 6 and 8 in these cases, however it has only been eager to recognise the applied relevance of Article 3. The Court has also construed restrictively the scope of application of the practical safeguards in cases of expulsion so as to restrict the relevance of Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol 7 for refugees. Other zones specifically applied to refugees have also been disappointing. This is the circumstance in particular of the basic standard of living for refugees under the ECHR based on Article 3 or 8, with the exclusion of the prevention of judgement. In stark contrast, the Court has been enthusiastic to develop the scope of Article 3 to require States to take positive steps as a much broader obligation than ever before in cases of nationals deprived of their right in police custody (Lambert, 2005).

Task 3

A. With reference to Zimbabwe, identify and explain the main forms of international human rights infringements.

According to human rights organisations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch the government of Zimbabwe disrupts the rights to food, shelter, freedom of programme and residence, freedom of assemblage and the defence of the law. There are beatings on the media, the political opposition, civil society activists, and human rights protectors.

The Zimbabwean authorities remain to use repression and pressure to silence human rights activists and to prevent them from revealing mishandlings and promoting respect for human rights. Harassment and uninformed arrests of human rights defenders have deepened since January 2011. For example, on February 8, police arrested two workers of the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum as they tried to conduct a survey on provisional justice. In the same period police also attacked the offices of a number of human rights NGOs and asked the employees. On May 23, police in Matabeleland North arrested two activists from the human rights organization ZimRights for convening a workshop on torture and its effects. Lawyers were denied access to the activists for three days before they were released. From 2001 to September 2006 the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum has noted over 1200 cases of human rights defilements by the law enforcement agencies, including 363 cases of torture, 516 cases of assault, 58 cases of death threats, 399 cases of unlawful arrest and 451 cases of unlawful detention. Many of these incidents include multiple victims (Human Right Watch, 2012).

b. Assess in depth at least TWO remedies available for breach of international human rights law by Zimbabwe such as those breaches identiﬁed in Task 3a above.

International human rights law also protects the right to an effective remedy. A victim’s right to an effective remedy not only obligates the state to prevent, investigate and punish serious human rights violations, but also provide reparations. Among various reparations mechanisms, states should restore the right violated and provide compensation for damages.

According to the Human Rights Committee, the ICCPR “requires that States Parties make amends to individuals whose Covenant rights have been despoiled. Without reparation to individuals whose Covenant rights have been violated, the obligation to provide an effective remedy, which is central to the efficacy of [enforcing the ICCPR] is not discharged. … The Covenant generally entails appropriate compensation.” Human Rights Committee, General Comment 31, para. 16. Compensation covers material losses, such as medical expenses and the loss of earnings, as well as economically assessable moral damage, such as pain and suffering (Human Right Watch, 2008).

According to International Law of South African in Article 15(2) of the Protocol obviates the need to pursue local remedies where one “is unable to proceed under the domestic jurisdiction”. Similarly, the African Charter provides that this principle need not be adhered to if it is clear that the procedure of achieving the remedy will be unduly prolonged. Therefore, in such situations, a party is at liberty to seek the audience of an international tribunal for redress (Precious and Ndlovu, 2011).

c. United Nations through for examples its Human Rights Council, and ONE other international human rights body/system are addressing human rights infringements such as those occurring in Zimbabwe.

United Nations human rights official has necessitated fast action by the globe body in conjunction with the government of the southern African nation to finish the “ongoing violations of human rights on the large scale” entailed by the eviction. vocation the Government's action incompatible with law in several respects, authority noted that the UN's Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement defend against whimsical displacement, need group action, adequate notice, acceptable relocation and reduction of adverse effects, in addition as acceptable provision of the wants of life to displaced persons, protection of their property and voluntary selections to displaced persons on wherever they're going to come back (Human Right Watch, 2008).

Another international human rights body named Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) leading human rights organisation has filed for a stay of the forced eviction of informal settlers in and around the Zimbabwean capital. ZimRights, along with its partner organisation, Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights, filed the application in the Harare High Court and it is expected to be heard (IRIN, 2008).

d. Evaluate the kinds of problems faced when trying to enforce the remedies such as those discussed in Task 3b and 3c above.

International human rights organization faces few problem when they tried to solve the problem in Zimbabwe. The government of Zimbabwe has wrong concept about human right organization nationally and internationally. There are culturally rigid. There is a widespread agreement among human rights organisations that systematic violations of the proper of non-public freedom and integrity are frequent in African country, particularly towards suspected members of the political opposition. The violations are perpetrated by government supporters yet as enforcement agencies, and embody assaults, torture, death threats, kidnappings and unlawful arrests and detentions. The Government of African nation trains and sponsors a National Youth Service, well-known conversationally because the "Green Bombers." The US Department of State describes the Youth Service as a bunch of undisciplined youths employed by the ruling government to suppress political dissent through barefaced acts of political violence. They are to blame for several of acts of politically motivated violence and are overtimes beneath the influence of government-issued narcotics. In Rhodesia the liberty of assembly is severely restricted by law. The legal framework is any stretched in apply, with enforcement closely observance opposition demonstrations and public gatherings. There are a unit several reports of the arrest and succeeding beating of demonstrators (Human Right Watch, 2008).

Task 4

a. Identify and discuss the role played by TWO NGOs and regional rights regimes in promoting and upholding human rights. You may choose from Amnesty International. Children’s Defence Fund. Human Rights Watch or any other of your choice.

Amnesty International is that the largest coalition for the protection of the rights of man everywhere the planet. It's a worldwide candidature movement that works to market all human rights, that has been fastidiously keeping within the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and different international standards. This organization may be a movement of individuals UN agency are fighting for human rights and for his or her international recognition. Amnesty International was shaped in London, European country in 1961 by Peter Benson and turns his attention to the violations of human rights and candidature for the protection of identical. In 1977, Amnesty International was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for her (against torture), and in 1978 received a present from the international organization for human rights. Amnesty International campaigns within the hope to assist people who want support and shield. The sphere of action of Amnesty International is clearly outlined and refers to the protection of human rights round the world. Specifically, this organization fights i.e. Key areas of operations:

1. protection of women;

2. protection of children;

3. ending the torture and execution,

4. protection of refugees;

5. protection and overcoming the phenomena of human rights violations that are related to his physical and psychological integrity;

6. abolishing the death penalty, torture and other cruel treatment has held prisoners;

7. Regulation of the global arms trade.

Besides the activities in these areas, Amnesty International stands for protection in zones of armed conflict, ending political killings and disappearances, ensuring prison conditions by international human rights standards, providing free education for all children in the world, breaking recruitment of child soldiers (Academia, 2014).

Human Rights Watch (HRW) is a world non-governmental organization that conducts analysis and support on human rights. Human Rights Watch was supported as a non-public yank NGO in 1978, below the name port Watch, to watch the previous Soviet Union's compliance with the port Accords. Human Rights Watch publishes analysis reports on violations of international human rights norms as kicked off by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and what it perceives to be alternative internationally accepted, human-rights norms. These reports area unit used because the basis for drawing international attention to abuses and pressuring governments and international organizations to reform. Human Rights Watch publishes analysis reports on violations of international human rights norms as kicked off by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and what it perceives to be alternative internationally accepted, human-rights norms. These reports area unit used because the basis for drawing international attention to abuses and pressuring governments and international organizations to reform. Researchers conduct investigatory missions to analyse suspect things additionally victimisation diplomacy, staying to bear with victims, creating files regarding public and people, and providing needed security for them in essential things and in a very correct time generate coverage in native and international media. Problems raised by Human Rights Watch in its reports embody social and gender discrimination, torture, military use of kids, political corruption, abuses in criminal justice systems, and therefore the legitimation of abortion. HRW has documented and according numerous violations of the laws of war and international humanitarian law (Human Right Watch, 2014).

b. Then demonstrate and Show how successful such NGO’s and regional right regimes are in upholding human rights.

The international human rights regime has made several welcome advances—including increased responsiveness in the Muslim world, attention to prevention and accountability for atrocities, and great powers less frequently standing in the way of action, notably at the UN Security Council (UNSC). Yet, despite responses to emergency cases demanding action, such as Sudan and Libya, global governance in ensuring human rights has faltered. Many specialists credit intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) for advances mainly in civil and political rights. These scholars cite the creation of an assortment of secretariats, administrative support, and expert personnel to institutionalize and implement human rights norms.

The greatest strength of the global governance architecture has been creating norms. Myriad treaties, agreements, and statements have enshrined human rights on the international community's agenda, and some regional organizations have followed suit. Monitoring is imperative to matching rhetoric with action. Over the years, human rights monitoring has matured and developed considerably, though serious challenges remain, such as ensuring freedom from torture for suspected terrorists, and uniformly protecting and promoting human rights despite the biases of rights organizations or officials entrusted with doing so. Capacity building—especially for human rights is often expensive and daunting, viewed with suspicion, and the success of assistance is notoriously hard to measure. In many cases, national governments have signed international commitments to promote and protect human rights, and earnestly wish to implement them, but are incapable of doing so. Atrocities of all sorts—whether war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, or ethnic cleansing—have been a major focus in the international community over the last two decades. A number of regional and country-specific courts, as well as the International Criminal Court (ICC), provide potential models for ending impunity. However, these courts have unevenly prosecuted violators of human rights, and have been criticized for focusing on some abuses or regions while ignoring others (CFR, 2013).

c. Analyse the challenges faced by NGOS and regional rights regimes such as those referred above, in promoting and upholding human rights.

While there's nobody Asian, African, Arab, or American perspective on human rights, it's doable to spot 2 broad sorts of views at intervals a given society: those bound up in cultural nationalism that are typically tied to and manipulated by the government; and what one would possibly decision the “activist-intellectual” perspective. The cultural nationalist perspective is simple to know: it is found in government info and policy statements aimed toward each native and international audiences. The expansion and achievements of the African human rights movement during a short area of your time are exceptional. If this section seems to put stress on the shortcomings of human rights NGOs-as known by the teams themselves and by the project researchers-this is because the aim of the study is to help strengthen the movement (CFR, 2013).

Inattentive a catalyst like the Asian values dispute, there has not been an assignation between Western and non-Western academics in Africa or the Middle East with the strength of that between Westerners and Asians. But there has been a fraternisation of ideas of human rights through other means. Most notably, the major UN human rights conferences that began in the 1990s—Rio (environment), Vienna (human rights), Cairo (population), Copenhagen (social exclusion), Beijing (women’s rights), Istanbul (human settlements), and Durban (racism)—have brought cumulative opportunities for the addition of regional discourses with global discourses. In what follows, it provides impressions of the contemporary human rights debates within four regions–Asia, the Arab world, Africa, and the United States—contrasting the cultural nationalist perspective with the intellectual perspective (Carnegie Council, 2003).

Conclusion

Human rights duties have come to include positive and negative requirements. This means that, in limited conditions, it may have a duty to take active steps to protect individuals’ rights (rather than merely refraining from directly violating those rights), including from non-state action. In adding, demand for defences beyond the traditional civil and political sphere have amplified the number and variety of securities which are now measured rights, particularly in the area of economic, social and cultural alarms. As such, we refer to States’ duties to: respect, protect, and fulfil the enjoyment of human rights. Human rights square measure those activities, conditions, and freedoms that everyone people in general square measure entitled to relish, by virtue of their humanity. They embody civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Human rights square measure inherent, inalienable, dependent, and indivisible by, that means they can't be granted or alienated, the enjoyment of 1 right affects the enjoyment of others, and that they should all be revered.

Reference(s)

Academia (2014). THE ROLE OF AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL IN PROTECTINGOF HUMAN RIGHTS. [ONLINE] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/4724747/THE_ROLE_OF_AMNESTY_INTERNATIONAL_IN_PROTECTING_OF_HUMAN_RIGHTS. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Carnegie Council (2003). The Challenge to International Human Rights. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/905.html. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

CFR (2013). The Global Human Rights Regime. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.cfr.org/human-rights/global-human-rights-regime/p27450. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

EEAS (2014). The EU and human rights. [ONLINE] Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/human_rights/index_en.htm. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Human Right Watch (2003). The Legal Prohibition against Torture. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2003/03/11/legal-prohibition-against-torture. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Human Right Watch (2008). Zimbabwe’s International Human Rights Obligations. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/zimbabwe0608/8.htm. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Human Right Watch (2012). World Report 2012: Zimbabwe. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-zimbabwe-0. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Human Right Watch (2014). About Human Right Watch. [ONLINE] Available at: www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/about. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

IRIN (2008). ZIMBABWE: Human rights body files for stay of forced evictions. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.irinnews.org/report/54761/zimbabwe-human-rights-body-files-for-stay-of-forced-evictions. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

JUSTICE (2013). EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [ONLINE] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Lambert, H., (2005). The European convention on Human Rights. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 24 (2), pp.39-55

Legislation (1998). Human Rights Act 1998. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Mashood, A., Baderin and ‎Ssenyonjo, M., (2013). International Human Rights Law: Six Decades after the UDHR and Beyond. 6th ed. Suite 420, 101 Cherry Street, Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

NESRI (2013). Basic Principles of the Human Rights Framework. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.nesri.org/programs/what-are-the-basic-principles-of-the-human-rights-framework. [Last Accessed 17 Feb 2015].

PHR (2006). Physicians for Human Rights Tools & Resources: Prohibition of Torture in International Law. [ONLINE] Available at: http://phrtoolkits.org/toolkits/istanbul-protocol-model-medical-curriculum/module-1-international-legal-standards-overview/torture/prohibition-of-torture-in-international-law/. [Last Accessed 18 Feb 2015].

Precious and Ndlovu, (2011). Campbell v Republic of Zimbabwe: A. SADC Law Journal. 1 (1), pp.63-79

Munna

Sunday, December 19, 2010

International Human Rights Law

Introduction